Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Romania suspended from Kyoto carbon trading

Published: 30 August 2011
Published on EurActiv (http://www.euractiv.com)


A UN panel has suspended Romania's right to trade its surplus carbon emissions after it breached rules on emissions reporting, Bucharest's environment ministry said on 28 August.

Background

The Kyoto Protocol allocated emissions caps to developed countries from 2008-12 through a quota system of carbon permits or credits. Governments that meet their targets can sell any difference in the form of Assigned Amount Units (AAU’s).

As well as actual emissions, other credits can be bought and sold. Land use changes brought about by reforestation can earn Removal Unit (RMU’s). Joint Implementation Projection investments can generate Emissions Reduction Units (ERU’s). And Clean Development Mechanism projects can accrue Certified Emissions Reductions (CER’s).

The EU carbon trading scheme was adopted under the Kyoto Protocol, which sets binding targets for 38 industrialised countries for reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 5% between 2008 and 2012 compared to their 1990 level.

The scheme allows around 12,000 companies including huge multinationals to buy and sell rights to pump industrial gases into the atmosphere.

The UNFCCC compliance committee, which had been meeting in Bonn for a week, found "irregularities" in Romania's 2010 greenhouse gas emissions data, and ruled that its national emissions inventory had been inadequately kept.

"Maybe tough measures will lead to more transparent information," Natalia Yakymenko, an analyst with Point Carbon, told EurActiv from Kiev.

"It's hard to evaluate whether Romania's projects have really generated anything."

At issue is the lightly regulated 'Track 1' procedure for trading Assigned Amount Units (AAUs), a carbon credit, under the Kyoto Protocol's Joint Implementation (JI) Mechanism.

'Track 2' agreements are supervised by the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee (JISC). But 'Track 1' deals are bilateral agreements regulated only by former Soviet bloc countries, and developed nations that want to offset their carbon emissions in them.

Third-party verification of projects is hard to establish when countries such as Romania "do not publish any information anywhere," Yakymenko said.

Because the UNFCCC ruled that Romania had not met the six eligibility criteria for AAU trading under Track 1, it will now only be able to trade under Track 2.

Asked his opinion of the transparency of Romania's JI procedures, Benoit Leguet, a member of the JISC, told EurActiv: "I would be a liar if I told you that I was fully satisfied."

"But the real problem is that the whole [Track 1] process is not transparent," he added.

In some countries, up to 75% of carbon credits - such as the JI's Emissions Reduction Units (ERUs) - are generated by Track 1 projects.

The JISC proposed merging the two tracks for project approval into a single system at last year's UN climate conference in Cancún, Leguet noted. But consensus could not be agreed.

Last December, Bucharest had hoped to earn €1.5 billion by selling 300 million carbon credits to two Japanese companies, according to Romanian Environment Minister Laszlo Borbely.

But Romania has now been suspended from Kyoto's carbon market – with immediate effect – until it can put in place an adequate system for monitoring emissions.

Prime Minister Emil Boc said he would fire the head of the country's environmental protection agency. He also called for measures to allow carbon trade to be restarted within six months.

"Romania will prepare a revised version of the national inventory and send it to the UNFCCC and based on its evaluation will then ask to reinstall eligibility as soon as possible," the environment ministry said in a statement.

On 25 August, another Eastern European country, Ukraine, also had its carbon credit trading rights suspended after the UNFCCC found that it had under-reported its greenhouse gas emissions.

Kiev had reportedly failed to act on earlier warnings that it was in non-compliance.

Oleksii Khabatuik, the head of Ukraine's emissions inventory, said that the country would appeal the decision.


1 comment:

tanu said...

I found this informative and interesting blog, so I think so it’s very useful and knowledgeable. I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me. I really thought that blog is spreading its wings rapidly......
Thanks a lot.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Carbon Trading
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^